|Reign||20 October [O.S. 8 October] 1894 – 15 March 1917|
|Coronation||26 May [O.S. 14 May] 1896|
De facto :
Georgy Lvov (chairman of the provisional government)
|Spouse||Alix of Hesse|
|Nikolay Alexandrovich Romanov|
|House||House of Holstein-Gottorp-Romanov|
|Father||Alexander III of Russia|
(Dagmar of Denmark)
|Born||18 May [O.S. 6 May] 1868
Alexander Palace, Tsarskoye Selo, Saint Petersburg, Russian Empire
|Died||17 July 1918
Yekaterinburg, Russian SFSR
|Burial||17 July 1998
Peter and Paul Cathedral, Saint Petersburg, Russian Federation
Nicholas II (Russian: Николай II, Николай Александрович Романов, tr. Nikolay II, Nikolay Alexandrovich Romanov classicistranieri.com/nicholas-ii-of-russia.html/?wiki-maping=[nʲɪkɐˈlaj ftɐˈroj, nʲɪkɐˈlaj əlʲɪkˈsandrəvʲɪtɕ rɐˈmanəf]" rel="nofollow">[nʲɪkɐˈlaj ftɐˈroj, nʲɪkɐˈlaj əlʲɪkˈsandrəvʲɪtɕ rɐˈmanəf]) (18 May [O.S. 6 May] 1868 – 17 July 1918) was the last Emperor of Russia, Grand Duke of Finland, and titular King of Poland. His official short title was Nicholas II, Emperor and Autocrat of All the Russias. Like other Russian Emperors he is commonly known by the monarchical title Tsar (though Russia formally ended the Tsardom in 1721). He is known as Saint Nicholas the Passion-Bearer by the Russian Orthodox Church and has been referred to as Saint Nicholas the Martyr.
Nicholas II ruled from 20 October 1894 until his forced abdication on 15 March 1917. His reign saw Imperial Russia go from being one of the foremost great powers of the world to economic and military collapse. Enemies nicknamed him Nicholas the Bloody because of the Khodynka Tragedy, the anti-Semitic pogroms, Bloody Sunday, his violent suppression of the 1905 Revolution, his execution of political opponents, and his pursuit of military campaigns on an unprecedented scale.
Under his rule, Russia was humiliatingly defeated in the Russo-Japanese War, which saw the almost total annihilation of the Russian Baltic Fleet at the Battle of Tsushima. The Anglo-Russian Entente, designed to counter German attempts to gain influence in the Middle East, ended the Great Game between Russia and the United Kingdom. As head of state, Nicholas approved the Russian mobilisation of August 1914, which marked the beginning of Russia’s involvement in the First World War, a war in which 3.3 million Russians were killed. The Imperial Army‘s severe losses and the High Command’s incompetent handling of the war, along with other policies directed by Nicholas during his reign, are often cited as the leading causes of the fall of the Romanov dynasty.
Nicholas II abdicated following the February Revolution of 1917 during which he and his family were imprisoned first in the Alexander Palace at Tsarskoye Selo, then later in the Governor’s Mansion in Tobolsk, and finally at the Ipatiev House in Yekaterinburg. In the spring of 1918, Nicholas was handed over to the local Ural soviet by commissar Vasili Yakovlev who was then presented with a written receipt as Nicholas was formally handed over like a parcel. Nicholas II; his wife, Alexandra Feodorovna; his son, Alexei Nikolaevich; his four daughters, Olga Nikolaevna, Tatiana Nikolaevna, Maria Nikolaevna and Anastasia Nikolaevna; the family’s medical doctor, Evgeny Botkin; the Emperor’s footman, Alexei Trupp; the Empress’ maidservant, Anna Demidova; and the family’s cook, Ivan Kharitonov, were executed in the same room by the Bolsheviks on the night of 16/17 July 1918. This led to the canonisation of Nicholas II, his wife the Empress Alexandra and their children as passion bearers, a category used to identify believers who, in imitation of Christ, endured suffering and death at the hands of political enemies, on 15 August 2000 by the Russian Orthodox Church within Russia and, in 1981, as martyrs by the Russian Orthodox Church Outside Russia, located in New York City.
- 1 Family background
- 2 Tsesarevich
- 3 Engagement, Accession and Marriage
- 4 Reign
- 5 Final months and execution (1918)
- 6 Identification
- 7 Sainthood
- 8 Assessment
- 9 Ancestors
- 10 Titles, styles, honours and Arms
- 11 Children
- 12 Titles of the Imperial Crown of Russia
- 13 Documentaries and films
- 14 References
- 15 Bibliography
- 16 Further reading
- 17 External links
Nicholas was the eldest son of Emperor Alexander III and Empress Maria Feodorovna of Russia (formerly Princess Dagmar of Denmark). He had five younger siblings: Alexander (1869–1870), George (1871–1899), Xenia (1875–1960), Michael (1878–1918) and Olga (1882–1960). Nicholas often referred to his father nostalgically in letters after Alexander’s death in 1894. He was also very close to his mother, as revealed in their published letters to each other.
His paternal grandparents were Emperor Alexander II and Empress Maria Alexandrovna of Russia (born Princess Marie of Hesse-Darmstadt). His maternal grandparents were King Christian IX and Queen Louise of Denmark. Nicholas was actually of primarily German descent, as well as Russian, Danish and French descent.
Nicholas was related to several monarchs in Europe. His mother’s siblings included Kings Frederik VIII of Denmark and George I of Greece as well as the United Kingdom’s Queen Alexandra (consort of King Edward VII). Nicholas, his wife, Alexandra, and Kaiser Wilhelm II of Germany were all first cousins of King George V. Nicholas was also a first cousin of both King Haakon VII and Queen Maud of Norway, as well as King Constantine I of Greece. While not first cousins, Nicholas and Kaiser Wilhelm II were second cousins, once removed, as each descended from King Frederick William III of Prussia, as well as third cousins, as they were both great-great-grandsons of Tsar Paul I of Russia. Nicholas and his wife, Alexandra, were also second cousins, as both descended from Louis II, Grand Duke of Hesse and his wife, Wilhelmine of Baden.
In his childhood, Nicholas, his parents and siblings made annual visits to the Danish royal palaces of Fredensborg and Bernstorff to visit his grandparents, the king and queen. The visits also served as family reunions, as his mother’s siblings would also come from England, Germany and Greece with their respective families. It was there, in 1883, that he enjoyed a brief flirtation with one of his English first cousins, Princess Victoria. In 1873, Nicholas also accompanied his parents and younger brother, two-year-old George, on a two-month, semi-official visit to England. In London, Nicholas and his family stayed at Marlborough House, as guests of his “Uncle Bertie” and “Aunt Alix,” the Prince and Princess of Wales, where he was spoiled by his uncle.
On 1 March 1881, following the assassination of his grandfather, Tsar Alexander II, Nicholas became Tsesarevich and his father became Tsar Alexander III. Nicholas and other family members witnessed Alexander II’s death because they were staying at the Winter Palace in Saint Petersburg where he was brought after being attacked. For security reasons, the new tsar and his family relocated their primary residence to the Gatchina Palace outside the city, only venturing into the capital for various ceremonial occasions, and even then, Alexander III and his family occupied the nearby Anichkov Palace.
In 1884, Nicholas’ coming of age ceremony was held at the Winter Palace, where he swore his loyalty to his father. Later that year, Nicholas’s uncle, Grand Duke Sergei Alexandrovich, married Princess Elizabeth of Hesse-Darmstadt, daughter of Louis IV, Grand Duke of Hesse, and his late wife Princess Alice of the United Kingdom (who had died in 1878) and a granddaughter of United Kingdom’s Queen Victoria. At the wedding in St. Petersburg, sixteen year-old Nicholas met with and developed feelings for the bride’s youngest surviving sister, twelve year-old Alix of Hesse-Darmstadt. Those feelings of admiration blossomed into love following her visit to St. Petersburg five years later, in 1889. She had feelings for him, in turn, but was a devout Lutheran who refused to convert to Russian Orthodoxy, eventually writing to Nicholas in 1893, telling him that they could not marry.
Eventually, in 1890, Nicholas, along with his younger brother Grand Duke George, and their cousin, Prince George of Greece set out on a world tour, although, Grand Duke George fell ill and was sent home partway through the trip. In April 1891, while travelling through the city of Otsu, Japan, Nicholas was the victim of an assassination attempt. The incident cut his trip short, yet he was present at the ceremonies in Vladivostok commemorating the beginning of work on the Trans-Siberian Railway. In 1893, Nicholas travelled to London on behalf of his parents to be present at the wedding of his cousin, George, Duke of York, to Mary of Teck. Queen Victoria was struck by the similar appearance of the two cousins, and the appearances confused some at the wedding. During this time, Nicholas had an affair with St. Petersburg ballerina Mathilde Kschessinska.
Despite being heir to the throne, however, Nicholas’s father failed to prepare him to become tsar. He attended meetings of the State Council, yet as his father was only in his forties, it was expected that it would be several years before Nicholas would take the throne. Sergei Witte, Russia’s finance minister, saw things differently and suggested that to the tsar that Nicholas be appointed to the Siberian Railway Committee. Alexander argued that Nicholas was not mature enough to take on serious responsibilities, to which Witte replied that if he was not introduced to state affairs Nicholas would never be ready to understand them. Alexander’s assumptions about living long and having years to prepare Nicholas for becoming tsar would be proven wrong, as by 1894, Alexander III was suffering from ill health.
Engagement, Accession and Marriage
In April 1894, Nicholas joined his Uncle Sergei and Aunt Elizabeth on a journey to Coburg, Germany for the wedding of Elisabeth and Alix’s brother, Ernst Ludwig of Hesse to their mutual cousin, Victoria Melita of Edinburgh. Other guests included Queen Victoria, Kaiser Wilhelm II, the Empress Frederick (Kaiser Wilhelm’s mother and Queen Victoria’s eldest daughter) Nicholas’s uncle, the Prince of Wales, and the bride’s parents, Alfred, the Duke of Edinburgh and Marie Alexandrovna, the Duchess of Edinburgh (sister of Alexander III).
Shortly after arriving in Coburg, Nicholas proposed to Alix, and she rejected his proposal on the grounds that she could not convert to Orthodoxy. After the wedding of Ernst and “Ducky”, however, the Kaiser had to talk with Alix, telling her that it was her duty to marry Nicholas as did Elizabeth, who voluntarily converted to Orthodoxy in 1892, and told her that there were not many differences between Lutheranism and Orthodoxy. After Nicholas proposed to her a second time, the two became officially engaged on 8 April 1894. For their parts, Nicholas’s parents were reluctant to give the engagement their blessing, as Alix had made poor impressions on her visits to Russia, only giving their consent after it became clear that Tsar Alexander’s health was deteriorating. Queen Victoria had also been initially opposed to the match, because, while she had no objections against Nicholas personally, she had a dislike of Russia.
That summer, Nicholas travelled to England to visit both Alix and the Queen. The visit coincided with the birth of the Duke and Duchess of York’s first child, the future King Edward VIII. Along with being present at the christening, Nicholas and Alix were listed amongst the child’s godparents. After several weeks in England, Nicholas returned home for the wedding of his sister, Xenia, to a cousin, Grand Duke Alexander Mikhailovich (“Sandro”).
By that fall, Alexander III was dying. Upon learning that he would at least be able survive for a fortnight, he had Nicholas summon Alix to the imperial palace at Livadia. Alix arrived on 10 October, and the Tsar insisted on receiving her in full dress uniform. Ten days later, Alexander III died at the age of forty-nine, leaving twenty-six year old Nicholas as tsar of Russia. That evening, Nicholas was consecrated by his father’s priest as Tsar Nicholas II and the following day, Alix was received into the Russian Orthodox Church, taking the name Alexandra Feodorovna.
Nicholas may have felt unprepared for the duties of the crown, asking his cousin and brother-in-law, Grand Duke Alexander, “What is going to happen to me and all of Russia?” Perhaps underprepared and unskilled, Nicholas was not altogether untrained for his duties as Tsar. Throughout his reign, Nicholas chose to maintain the conservative policies favoured by his father. While Alexander had concentrated on the formulation of general policy, Nicholas devoted much more attention to the details of administration.
Leaving Livadia on 16 October, the funeral procession, which included relatives Nicholas’s aunt, Queen Olga of the Hellenes (herself a Romanov by birth), and the Prince and Princess of Wales, who had arrived at Livadia from London two days after Alexander’s death (the Princess of Wales being the favourite sister of Nicholas’s mother), arrived in Moscow. After laying in state in the Kremlin, the body was then taken to St. Petersburg, where the funeral was held on 7 November.
Nicholas and Alix’s wedding was originally scheduled for the spring of 1895, but it was moved forward at Nicholas’ insistence. Staggering under the weight of his new office, he had no intention of allowing the one person who gave him confidence to leave his side. Instead, Nicholas’ wedding to Alix, who had taken the name Alexandra Feodorovna upon her reception into the Orthodox Church the day after Alexander’s death, took place on 26 November 1894, the Dowager Empress Marie Feodorovna’s birthday, when court mourning could be slightly relaxed. Alexandra wore the traditional dress of Romanov brides, and Nicholas a hussar‘s uniform. Nicholas and Alexandra, each holding a lighted candle, faced the palace priest; a few minutes before one in the afternoon, they were married.
Despite a visit to the United Kingdom in 1893, where he observed the House of Commons in debate and seemed impressed by the machinery of democracy, as well as a similar positive appraisal of the US Congress on an official visit to the United States as Tsarevitch, Nicholas turned his back on any notion of giving away any power to elected representatives in Russia. Shortly after he came to the throne, a deputation of peasants and workers from various towns’ local assemblies (zemstvos) came to the Winter Palace proposing court reforms, such as the adoption of a constitutional monarchy, and reform that would improve the political and economic life of the peasantry.
Although the addresses they had sent in beforehand were couched in mild and loyal terms, Nicholas was angry and ignored advice from an Imperial Family Council by saying to them: “… it has come to my knowledge that during the last months there have been heard in some assemblies of the zemstvos the voices of those who have indulged in a senseless dream that the zemstvos be called upon to participate in the government of the country. I want everyone to know that I will devote all my strength to maintain, for the good of the whole nation, the principle of absolute autocracy, as firmly and as strongly as did my late lamented father.”
On 26 May 1896, Nicholas’ formal coronation as Tsar was held in Uspensky Cathedral located within the Kremlin. In celebration on 27 May 1896, a large festival with food, free beer and souvenir cups was held in Khodynka Field outside Moscow. Khodynka was chosen as the location as it was the only place near Moscow large enough to hold all of the Moscow citizens.
Khodynka was primarily used as a military training ground and the field was uneven with trenches. Before the food and drink were handed out, rumours spread that there wouldn’t be enough for everyone. The crowd rushed to get their share and individuals were tripped and trampled, suffocating in the dirt of the field. Of the approximate 100,000 in attendance, it is estimated that 1,389 individuals died and roughly 1,300 were injured.
The Khodynka Tragedy was seen as a bad omen and Nicholas found gaining popular trust difficult from the beginning of his reign. The French ambassador’s gala was planned for that night. The Tsar wanted to stay in his chambers and pray for the lives lost, but his uncles believed that his absence at the ball would strain relations with France, particularly the 1894 Franco-Russian Alliance. Nicholas attended the party. The mourning populace saw Nicholas as frivolous and uncaring.
During the autumn after the coronation, Nicholas and Alexandra made a tour of Europe. After making visits to the emperor and empress of Austria-Hungary, the Kaiser of Germany, and Nicholas’ Danish grandparents and relatives, Nicholas and Alexandra took possession of their new yacht, the Standart, which had been built in Denmark. From there, they made a journey to Scotland to spend some time with Queen Victoria at Balmoral Castle. While Alexandra enjoyed her reunion with her grandmother, Nicholas complained in a letter to his mother about being forced to go shooting with his uncle, the Prince of Wales, in bad weather, and was suffering from a bad toothache.
The first years of his reign saw little more than continuation and development of the policy pursued by Alexander III. Nicholas allotted money for the All-Russia exhibition of 1896. In 1897 restoration of gold standard by Sergei Witte, Minister of Finance, completed the series of financial reforms, initiated fifteen years earlier. By 1902, the Trans-Siberian Railway was nearly completed; this helped the Russians trade in the Far East but the railway still required huge amounts of work.
In foreign relations, Nicholas followed policies of his father, strengthening the Franco-Russian Alliance and pursuing a policy of general European pacification, which culminated in the famous Hague peace conference. This conference, suggested and promoted by Nicholas II, was convened with the view of terminating the arms race, and setting up machinery for the peaceful settlement of international disputes. The results of the conference were less than expected, because of the mutual distrust existing between great powers. Still, the Hague conventions were among the first formal statements of the laws of war. In 1901 Nicholas II (and the famous Russian diplomat Friedrich Martens) were nominated for the Nobel Peace Prize – for the initiative to convene the Hague Peace Conference and contribute to its implementation.
He was Colonel in Chief of the Royal Scots Greys from 1894 until his death. On becoming Colonel in Chief he presented the Regiment with a white bearskin, now worn by the bass drummer of the Pipes and Drums of the Royal Scots Dragoon Guards. The Imperial Russian anthem is still played at dinner nights in the Officers’ Mess, where there is still a portrait of the Tsar in Scots Greys uniform. Since his killing the Regiment has worn a black backing behind its capbadge to mourn his death.
In 1903, Nicholas threw himself into an ecclesiastical matter regarding the canonisation of Seraphim of Sarov. The previous year, it had been suggested that if he was canonised, the imperial couple would have a son and heir to throne. While Alexandra demanded in July 1902 that Seraphim be canonised in less than a week, Nicholas demanded that he be canonised within a year. Despite a public outcry, the Church bowed to the intense imperial pressure, declaring Seraphim worthy of canonisation in January 1903. That summer, the imperial family travelled to Sarov for the canonisation.
A clash between Russia and the Empire of Japan was almost inevitable by the turn of the 20th century. Russia had expanded in the Far East, and the growth of its settlement and territorial ambitions, as its southward path to the Balkans was frustrated, conflicted with Japan’s own territorial ambitions on the Chinese and Asian mainland. Nicholas pursued an aggressive foreign policy with regards to Manchuria and Korea, and strongly supported the scheme for timber concessions in these areas as developed by the Bezobazov group.
With the Russian Far East fleet trapped at Port Arthur, the only other Russian Fleet was the Baltic Fleet; it was half a world away, but the decision was made to send the fleet on a nine-month voyage to the East. Great Britain would not allow the Russian navy to use the Suez Canal, due to their alliance with the Empire of Japan and due to an incident where the Baltic Fleet mistakenly fired on British fishing boats in the North Sea. The Russian Baltic Fleet traversed the world to lift the blockade on Port Arthur, but after many misadventures on the way, was nearly annihilated by the Japanese in the Battle of the Tsushima Strait. On land the Imperial Russian Army experienced logistical problems. While commands and supplies came from St. Petersburg, combat took place in east Asian ports with only the Trans-Siberian Railway for transport of supplies as well as troops both ways. The 6,000-mile (9,700 km) rail line between St. Petersburg and Port Arthur was single-track, with no track around Lake Baikal, allowing only gradual build-up of the forces on the front. Besieged Port Arthur fell to the Japanese, after nine months of resistance.
Nicholas’s stance on the war was something that baffled many. Nicholas approached the war with confidence and saw it as an opportunity to raise Russian morale and patriotism, paying little attention to the finances of a long-distance war. Shortly before the Japanese attack on Port Arthur, Nicholas held strong to the belief that there would be no war. Despite the onset of the war and the many defeats Russia suffered, Nicholas still believed in, and expected, a final victory, maintaining an image of the racial inferiority and military weakness of the Japanese.
As Russia continued to face defeat by the Japanese, the call for peace grew. Nicholas’s own mother, as well as his cousin, Emperor Wilhelm II, urged Nicholas to open peace negotiations. Despite the efforts for peace, Nicholas remained evasive, sending a telegram to Wilhelm II on 10 October that it was his intent to keep on fighting until the Japanese were driven from Manchuria. It was not until 27–28 March 1905 and the annihilation of the Russian fleet by the Japanese, that Nicholas finally decided to pursue peace. Nicholas II accepted American mediation, appointing Sergei Witte chief plenipotentiary for the peace talks. The war was ended by the Treaty of Portsmouth.
Anti-Jewish pogroms of 1903–1906
The Kishinev newspaper Bessarabets, which published anti-Jewish materials, received funds from Viacheslav Plehve, Minister of the Interior. These publications served to fuel the Kishinev pogrom. The government of Nicholas II formally condemned the rioting, dismissed the regional governor, the perpetrators were arrested and punished by the court. Leadership of the Russian Orthodox Church also condemned anti-Jewish pogroms. Appeals to the faithful condemning the anti-Jewish pogroms were read publicly in all churches of Russia. However, in private Nicholas expressed his admiration for the mobs, viewing anti-Semitism as a useful tool for unifying the people behind his regime.
Bloody Sunday (1905)
A few days prior to the Bloody Sunday (9 (22) January 1905), the leader of the initiative, a priest named George Gapon, informed the government of the forthcoming procession to the Winter Palace to hand a petition to the Tsar. On the evening before, on Saturday, 8 (21) January, the ministers convened to consider the situation. There was never any thought that the Tsar, who had left the capital for Tsarskoye Selo on the advice of the ministers would actually be asked to meet Gapon; the suggestion that some other member of the Imperial family receive the petition was rejected.
Finally informed by the Prefect of Police that he lacked the men to pluck Gapon from among his followers and place him under arrest, the newly appointed Minister of the Interior, Prince Sviatopolk-Mirsky, and his colleagues decided to bring additional troops into the city for control. That evening Nicholas wrote in his diary, “Troops have been brought from the outskirts to reinforce the garrison. Up to now the workers have been calm. Their number is estimated at 120,000. At the head of their union is a kind of socialist priest named Gapon. Mirsky came this evening to present his report on the measures taken.”
On Sunday, 9 (22) January 1905, Gapon began his march. Locking arms, the workers marched peacefully through the streets. Some carried religious icons and banners, as well as national flags and portraits of the Tsar. As they walked they sang hymns and the Imperial anthem, ‘God Save The Tsar’. At 2PM all of the converging processions were scheduled to arrive at the Winter Palace. There was no single confrontation with the troops. Throughout the city, at bridges on strategic boulevards, the marchers found their way blocked by lines of infantry, backed by Cossacks and Hussars; and the soldiers opened fire on the crowd.
The official number of victims was 92 dead and several hundred wounded. Gapon vanished and the other leaders of the march were seized. Expelled from the capital, they circulated through the empire, increasing the casualties. As bullets riddled their icons, their banners and their portraits of Nicholas, the people shrieked, “The Tsar will not help us!”. Outside Russia, the future British Labour Prime Minister Ramsay MacDonald attacked the Tsar, calling him a “blood-stained creature and a common murderer”.
That evening Nicholas wrote in his diary:
Difficult day! In St. Petersburg there were serious disturbances due to the desire of workers to get to the Winter Palace. The troops had to shoot in different places of the city, there were many dead and wounded. Lord, how painful and bad!
Grand Duchess Olga Alexandrovna (Nicholas’s sister) wrote afterwards:
Nicky had the police report a few days before. That Saturday he telephoned my mother at the Anitchkov and said that she and I were to leave for Gatchina at once. He and Alicky went to Tsarskoye Selo. Insofar as I remember, my Uncles Vladimir and Nicholas were the only members of the family left in St. Petersburg, but there may have been others. I felt at the time that all those arrangements were hideously wrong. Nicky’s ministers and the Chief of Police had it all their way. My mother and I wanted him to stay in St. Petersburg and to face the crowd. I am positive that, for all the ugly mood of some of the workmen, Nicky’s appearance would have calmed them. They would have presented their petition and gone back to their homes. But that wretched Epiphany incident had left all the senior officials in a state of panic. They kept on telling Nicky that he had no right to run such a risk, that he owed it to the country to leave the capital, that even with the utmost precautions taken there might always be some loophole left. My mother and I did all we could to persuade him that the ministers’ advice was wrong, but Nicky preferred to follow it and he was the first to repent when he heard of the tragic outcome.
From his hiding place, Gapon issued a letter. He stated, “Nicholas Romanov, formerly Tsar and at present soul-murderer of the Russian empire. The innocent blood of workers, their wives and children lies forever between you and the Russian people … May all the blood which must be spilled fall upon you, you Hangman. I call upon all the socialist parties of Russia to come to an immediate agreement among themselves and bring an armed uprising against Tsarism.”
With the defeat of Russia by a non-Western power, the prestige and power of the government and the authority of the autocratic empire was brought down significantly. Defeat was a severe blow and the Imperial government collapsed, with the ensuing revolutionary outbreaks of 1905–1906. In hope to frighten any further contradiction many demonstrators were shot as they tried to march to the Winter Palace in St. Petersburg; the Emperor’s Uncle, Grand Duke Sergei, was killed by a revolutionary’s bomb in Moscow as he left the Kremlin. The Black Sea Fleet mutinied, and a railway strike developed into a general strike which paralysed the country. Tsar Nicholas II, who was taken by surprise by the events, mixed his anger with bewilderment. He wrote to his mother after months of disorder:
It makes me sick to read the news! Nothing but strikes in schools and factories, murdered policemen, Cossacks and soldiers, riots, disorder, mutinies. But the ministers, instead of acting with quick decision, only assemble in council like a lot of frightened hens and cackle about providing united ministerial action… ominous quiet days began, quiet indeed because there was complete order in the streets, but at the same time everybody knew that something was going to happen — the troops were waiting for the signal, but the other side would not begin. One had the same feeling, as before a thunderstorm in summer! Everybody was on edge and extremely nervous and of course, that sort of strain could not go on for long…. We are in the midst of a revolution with an administrative apparatus entirely disorganized, and in this lies the main danger.
Relationship with the Duma
Under pressure from the attempted 1905 Russian Revolution, on 5 August of that year Nicholas II issued a manifesto about the convocation of the State Duma, initially thought to be an advisory organ. In the October Manifesto, the Tsar pledged to introduce basic civil liberties, provide for broad participation in the State Duma, and endow the Duma with legislative and oversight powers. He was determined, however, to preserve his autocracy even in the context of reform. This was signalled in the text of the 1906 constitution. He was still described as an autocrat, and retained sweeping executive powers. For instance, cabinet ministers were responsible only to him.
Nicholas’ relations with the Duma were not good. The First Duma, with a majority of Kadets, almost immediately came into conflict with him. Scarcely had the 524 members sat down at the Tauride Palace when they formulated an ‘Address to the Throne’. It demanded universal suffrage, radical land reform, the release of all political prisoners and the dismissal of ministers appointed by the Tsar in favour of ministers acceptable to the Duma.
Grand Duchess Olga Alexandrovna, the younger sister of Nicholas II, wrote, “There was such gloom at Tsarskoye Selo. I did not understand anything about politics. I just felt everything was going wrong with the country and all of us. The October Constitution did not seem to satisfy anyone. I went with my mother to the first Duma. I remember the large group of deputies from among peasants and factory people. The peasants looked sullen. But the workmen were worse: they looked as though they hated us. I remember the distress in Alicky’s eyes.”
Minister of the Court Count Fredericks commented, “The Deputies, they give one the impression of a gang of criminals who are only waiting for the signal to throw themselves upon the ministers and cut their throats. I will never again set foot among those people.” The Dowager Empress noticed “incomprehensible hatred.”
Although Nicholas initially had a good relationship with his prime minister, Sergei Witte, Alexandra distrusted him because he had instigated an investigation of Grigori Rasputin, and as the political situation deteriorated, Nicholas dissolved the Duma. The Duma was populated with radicals, many of whom wished to push through legislation that would abolish private property ownership, among other things. Witte, unable to grasp the seemingly insurmountable problems of reforming Russia and the monarchy, wrote to Nicholas on 14 April 1906 resigning his office (however, other accounts have said that Witte was forced to resign by the Emperor). Nicholas was not ungracious to Witte and an Imperial Rescript was published on 22 April creating Witte a Knight of the Order of Saint Alexander Nevsky, with diamonds (the last two words were written in the Emperor’s own hand, followed by “I remain unalterably well-disposed to you and sincerely grateful, for ever more Nicholas.”).
A second Duma met for the first time in February 1907. The leftist parties—including the Social Democrats and the Social Revolutionaries, who had boycotted the First Duma—had won 200 seats in the Second, more than a third of the membership. Again Nicholas waited impatiently to rid himself of the Duma. In two letters to his mother he let his bitterness flow, “A grotesque deputation is coming from England to see liberal members of the Duma. Uncle Bertie informed us that they were very sorry but were unable to take action to stop their coming. Their famous ‘liberty’, of course. How angry they would be if a deputation went from us to the Irish to wish them success in their struggle against their government.”
A little while later Nicholas wrote, “All would be well if everything said in the Duma remained within its walls. Every word spoken, however, comes out in the next day’s papers which are avidly read by everyone. In many places the populace is getting restive again. They begin to talk about land once more and are waiting to see what the Duma is going to say on the question. I am getting telegrams from everywhere, petitioning me to order a dissolution, but it is too early for that. One has to let them do something manifestly stupid or mean and then — slap! And they are gone!”
After the Second Duma resulted in similar problems, the new prime minister Pyotr Stolypin (whom Witte described as ‘reactionary’) unilaterally dissolved it, and changed the electoral laws to allow for future Dumas to have a more conservative content, and to be dominated by the liberal-conservative Octobrist Party of Alexander Guchkov. Stolypin, a skilful politician, had ambitious plans for reform. These included making loans available to the lower classes to enable them to buy land, with the intent of forming a farming class loyal to the crown. Nevertheless, when the Duma remained hostile, Stolypin had no qualms about invoking Article 87 of the Fundamental Laws, which empowered the Tsar to issue ‘urgent and extraordinary’ emergency decrees ‘during the recess of the State Duma’. Stolypin’s most famous legislative act, the change in peasant land tenure, was promulgated under Article 87.
The third Duma remained an independent body. This time the members proceeded cautiously. Instead of hurling themselves at the government, opposing parties within the Duma worked to develop the body as a whole. In the classic manner of the British Parliament, the Duma reached for power grasping for the national purse strings. The Duma had the right to question ministers behind closed doors as to their proposed expenditures. These sessions, endorsed by Stolypin, were educational for both sides, and, in time, mutual antagonism was replaced by mutual respect. Even the sensitive area of military expenditure, where the October Manifesto clearly had reserved decisions to the throne, a Duma commission began to operate. Composed of aggressive patriots no less anxious than Nicholas to restore the fallen honour of Russian arms, the Duma commission frequently recommended expenditures even larger than those proposed.
With the passage of time, Nicholas also began to have confidence in the Duma. “This Duma cannot be reproached with an attempt to seize power and there is no need at all to quarrel with it,” he said to Stolypin in 1909. Unfortunately, Stolypin’s plans were undercut by conservatives at court. Reactionaries such as Prince Vladimir Orlov never tired of telling the Tsar that the very existence of the Duma was a blot on the autocracy, which Tsaritsa Alexandra had always believed anyway. Stolypin, they whispered, was a traitor and secret revolutionary who was conniving with the Duma to steal the prerogatives assigned the Tsar by God. Witte also engaged in constant intrigue against Stolypin. Although Stolypin had had nothing to do with Witte’s fall, Witte blamed him. Stolypin had unwittingly angered the Tsaritsa. He had ordered an investigation into Rasputin and presented it to the Tsar, who read it but did nothing. Stolypin, on his own authority, ordered Rasputin to leave St. Petersburg. Alexandra protested vehemently but Nicholas refused to overrule his Prime Minister, who had more influence with the Emperor.
By the time of Stolypin’s assassination by Dmitry Bogrov, a student (and police informant) in a theatre in Kiev on 18 September 1911, Stolypin had grown weary of the burdens of office. For a man who preferred clear decisive action, working with a sovereign who believed in fatalism and mysticism was frustrating. As an example, Nicholas once returned a document unsigned with the note: “Despite most convincing arguments in favour of adopting a positive decision in this matter, an inner voice keeps on insisting more and more that I do not accept responsibility for it. So far my conscience has not deceived me. Therefore I intend in this case to follow its dictates. I know that you, too, believe that ‘a Tsar’s heart is in God’s hands.’ Let it be so. For all laws established by me I bear a great responsibility before God, and I am ready to answer for my decision at any time.”
Alexandra, believing that Stolypin had severed the bonds that her son depended on for life, hated the Prime Minister. In March 1911, in a fit of anger stating that he no longer commanded the imperial confidence, Stolypin asked to be relieved of his office. Two years earlier when Stolypin had casually mentioned resigning to Nicholas he was informed:
This is not a question of confidence or lack of it. It is my will. Remember that we live in Russia, not abroad…and therefore I shall not consider the possibility of any resignation.
It never got that far. On 18 September 1911, in a procession where Stolypin’s car was unprotected, Rasputin had coincidentally returned from his exile. As Stolypin’s car passed him, Rasputin cried out in a loud voice, “Death is after him! Death is driving behind him!” Bogrov assassinated Stolypin in the Kiev theatre that night.
In 1912, a fourth Duma was elected with almost the same membership as the third. “The Duma started too fast. Now it is slower, but better, and more lasting,” stated Nicholas to Sir Bernard Pares.
The First World War was, by-and-far, a loss for Russia. By late 1916, among the Romanov family desperation reached the point of which Grand Duke Paul Alexandrovich, younger brother of Alexander III and the Tsar’s only surviving uncle, was deputed to beg Nicholas to grant a constitution and a government responsible to the Duma. Nicholas sternly refused, reproaching his uncle for asking him to break his coronation oath to maintain autocratic power intact for his successors. In the Duma on 2 December 1916, Vladimir Purishkevich, a fervent patriot, monarchist and war worker, denounced the dark forces which surrounded the throne in a thunderous two-hour speech which was tumultuously applauded. “Revolution threatens” – he warned – “and an obscure peasant shall govern Russia no longer!”
Tsesarevich Alexei’s illness and Rasputin
Further complicating domestic matters was the matter of the succession. Alexandra bore Nicholas four daughters, the Grand Duchess Olga in 1895, the Grand Duchess Tatiana in 1897, Grand Duchess Maria in 1899, and Grand Duchess Anastasia in 1901, before their son Alexei was born on 12 August 1904. The young heir was afflicted with Haemophilia B, a hereditary disease that prevents blood from clotting properly, which at that time was untreatable and usually led to an untimely death. As a granddaughter of Queen Victoria, Alexandra carried the same gene mutation that afflicted several of the major European royal houses, such as Prussia and Spain. Hemophilia therefore became known as “the royal disease“. Alexandra had passed it on to her son. As all of Nicholas and Alexandra’s daughters perished with their parents and brother in Yekaterinburg in 1918, it is not known whether any of them inherited the gene as carriers.
Because of the fragility of the autocracy at this time, Nicholas and Alexandra chose not to divulge Alexei’s condition to anyone outside the royal household. In fact, there were many in the Imperial household who were unaware of the exact nature of the Tsesarevich’s illness. At first Alexandra turned to Russian doctors and medics to treat Alexei; however, their treatments generally failed, and Alexandra increasingly turned to mystics and holy men (or starets as they were called in Russian). One of these starets, an illiterate Siberian, Grigori Rasputin, appeared to have some success. Rasputin’s influence over Empress Alexandra, and consequently the Tsar, had grown stronger ever since 1912, when the Tsesarevich nearly died from an injury while the family was on vacation at the hunting lodges at Bialowieza and Spala (now part of Poland). The bleeding grew steadily worse until it was assumed that the Tsesarevich would not survive, and the Last Sacrament was administered on 10 October 1912. Desperate, Alexandra called Rasputin as a last resort, and the reply came, “God has seen your tears and heard your prayers. Do not grieve. The Little One will not die. Do not allow the doctors to bother him too much.” The haemorrhage stopped the next day and the boy began to recover. Alexandra took this as a sign that Rasputin was a starets and that God was with him; for the rest of her life she would defend him and turn her wrath against anyone who dared to question him.
In 1907, to counter perceived German aggression, Russia and Great Britain signed the Anglo-Russian Convention. Great Britain had already entered into the Entente cordiale with France in 1904, and the Anglo-Russian alliance led to the formation of the Triple Entente. The following year, in May 1908, Nicholas and Alexandra’s mutual “Uncle Bertie” and “Aunt Alix,” Britains’s King Edward VII and Queen Alexandra made a state visit to Russia, being the first reigning British monarchs to do so. However, they did not set foot on Russian soil. Instead, they stayed aboard their yachts, meeting off the coast of modern day Tallinn. Later that year, Nicholas was taken off guard by the news that his foreign minister, Alexander Izvolsky had entered into a secret agreement with the Austro-Hungarian foreign minister, Count Alois von Aehrenthal, agreeing that, in exchange for Russian naval access to the Dardanelles and the Bosporus Strait, Russia would not oppose the Austrian annexation of Bosnia and Herzegovina, a revision of the 1878 Treaty of Berlin. When Austria-Hungary did annex this territory that October, it precipitated the diplomatic crisis. When Russia protested about the annexation, the Austrians threatened to leak secret communications between Izvolsky and Aehernthal, prompting Nicholas to complain in a letter to the Austrian emperor, Franz Joseph, about a breach of confidence. In 1909, in the wake of the Anglo-Russian alliance, the Russian imperial family made a visit to England, staying on the Isle of Wight for Cowes Week. In 1913, during the Balkan Wars, Nicholas personally offered to arbitrate between Serbia and Bulgaria. However, the Bulgarians rejected his offer. Also in 1913, Nicholas, albeit without Alexandra, made a visit to Berlin for the wedding of Kaiser Wilhelm II’s daughter, Princess Victoria Louise, to a maternal cousin of Nicholas, Ernest Augustus, the Duke of Brunswick. Nicholas was also joined by his cousin, King George V and his wife, Queen Mary.
In February 1913, Nicholas presided over the tercentenary celebrations for the Romanov Dynasty. On 21 February, a Te Deum took place at Kazan Cathedral, and a state reception at the Winter Palace. In May, Nicholas and the imperial family made a pilgrimage across the empire, retracing the route down the Volga River that was made by the teenage Michael Romanov from the Ipatiev Monastery in Kostroma to Moscow in 1613 when agreed to become tsar.
First World War
On 28 June 1914, Archduke Franz Ferdinand was assassinated by Gavrilo Princip, a member of the Serbian nationalist association known as the Black Hand, in Sarajevo. Nicholas vacillated as to Russia’s course of action. The outbreak of war was not inevitable, but leaders, diplomats and nineteenth-century alliances created a climate for large-scale conflict. The concept of Pan-Slavism and ethnicity allied Russia and Serbia in a treaty of protection, and Germany and Austria were similarly allied. Territorial conflict created rivalries between Germany and France and between Austria and Serbia, and as a consequence alliance networks developed across Europe. The Triple Entente and Triple Alliance networks were set before the war. The assassination of Ferdinand tripped these alliance networks bringing each country into conflict with one another as each independently declared war. Nicholas wanted neither to abandon Serbia to the ultimatum of Austria-Hungary, nor to provoke a general war. In a series of letters exchanged with Kaiser Wilhelm of Germany (the so-called “Willy and Nicky correspondence”) the two proclaimed their desire for peace, and each attempted to get the other to back down. Nicholas took stern measures in this regard, demanding that Russia’s mobilisation be only against the Austrian border, in the hopes of preventing war with the German Empire.
The Russians had no contingency plans for a partial mobilisation, and on 31 July 1914 Nicholas took the fateful step of confirming the order for a general mobilisation. He was strongly counselled against mobilisation of the Russian forces but chose to ignore such advice. On 25 July 1914, the council of ministers was held in Krasnoye Selo at which Tsar Nicholas II decided to intervene in the Austro-Serbian conflict, thereby helping bringing about a general war (which would become the First World War). He put the Russian army on “alert” on 25 July. Although this was not mobilisation, it threatened the German and Austrian borders and looked like a military declaration of war.
On 28 July, Austria formally declared war against Serbia, bringing Germany into conflict with Russia and with France and Britain as Russia’s allies. On 29 July 1914, Nicholas II sent a telegram to Wilhelm II (The Willy-Nicky Correspondence), with the suggestion to submit the Austro-Serbian problem to the Hague Conference (in Hague tribunal). Wilhelm II did not address the question of the Hague Conference in his subsequent reply. Count Witte told the French Ambassador Paleologue that from Russia’s point of view the war was madness, Slav solidarity was simply nonsense and Russia could hope for nothing from the war. On 31 July, Russia completed its mobilisation, but still maintained that it would not attack if peace talks were to begin. Germany then replied that Russia must demobilise within the next twelve hours. In Saint Petersburg, at 7pm, with the ultimatum to Russia expired, the German ambassador to Russia met with the Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Sazonov, asked three times if Russia would reconsider, and then with shaking hands, delivered the note accepting Russia’s war challenge and declaring war.
The outbreak of war on 1 August 1914 found Russia grossly unprepared. Russia and her allies placed their faith in her army, the famous ‘Russian steamroller’. Its pre-war regular strength was 1,400,000; mobilisation added 3,100,000 reserves and millions more stood ready behind them. In every other respect, however, Russia was unprepared for war. Germany had ten times as much railway track per square mile, and whereas Russian soldiers travelled an average of 800 miles (1,290 km) to reach the front, German soldiers travelled less than a quarter of that distance. Russian heavy industry was still too small to equip the massive armies the Tsar could raise, and her reserves of munitions were pitifully small; while the German army in 1914 was better equipped than any other, man-for-man, the Russians were severely short on artillery pieces, shells, motorised transports, and even boots. With the Baltic Sea barred by German U-boats and the Dardanelles by the guns of Germany’s ally, Turkey, Russia initially could receive help only via Archangel which was frozen solid in winter, or via Vladivostok, which was over 4,000 miles (6,400 km) from the front line. By 1915, a rail line was built north from Petrozavodsk to the Kola Gulf and this connection laid the foundation of the ice-free port of what eventually was called Murmansk. The Russian High Command was moreover greatly weakened by the mutual contempt between Vladimir Sukhomlinov, the Minister of War, and the redoubtable warrior giant Grand Duke Nicholas Nikolayevich who commanded the armies in the field. In spite of all of this, an immediate attack was ordered against the German province of East Prussia. The Germans mobilised there with great efficiency and completely defeated the two Russian armies which had invaded. The Battle of Tannenberg, where an entire Russian army was annihilated, cast an ominous shadow over the empire’s future. The loyal officers lost were the very ones needed to protect the dynasty. The Russian armies later had moderate success against both the Austro-Hungarian armies and against the forces of the Ottoman Empire, but they never succeeded against the might of the German Army.
Gradually a war of attrition set in on the vast Eastern Front, where the Russians were facing the combined forces of the German and Austro-Hungarian Empires, and they suffered staggering losses. General Denikin, retreating from Galicia wrote, “The German heavy artillery swept away whole lines of trenches, and their defenders with them. We hardly replied. There was nothing with which we could reply. Our regiments, although completely exhausted, were beating off one attack after another by bayonet … Blood flowed unendingly, the ranks became thinner and thinner and thinner. The number of graves multiplied.” Total losses for the spring and summer of 1915 amounted to 1,400,000 killed or wounded, while 976,000 had been taken prisoner. On 5 August, with the Russian army in retreat, Warsaw fell. Defeat at the front bred disorder at home. At first, the targets were German, and for three days in June shops, bakeries, factories, private houses and country estates belonging to people with German names were looted and burned. The inflamed mobs then turned on the government, declaring the Empress should be shut up in a convent, the Tsar deposed and Rasputin hanged. Nicholas was by no means deaf to these discontents. An emergency session of the Duma was summoned, and a Special Defense Council established, its members drawn from the Duma and the Tsar’s ministers.
In July 1915, King Christian X of Denmark, first cousin of the Tsar, sent Hans Niels Andersen to Tsarskoye Selo with an offer to act as a mediator. He made several trips between London, Berlin and Petrograd and in July saw the Dowager Empress Maria Fyodorovna. Andersen told her they should conclude peace. Nicholas chose to turn down King Christian’s offer of mediation.
The energetic and efficient General Alexei Polivanov replaced Sukhomlinov as Minister of War, which failed to improve the strategic situation. In the aftermath of The Great Retreat and the loss of the Kingdom of Poland, Nicholas assumed the role of commander-in-chief after dismissing his cousin, Nikolay Nikolayevich, in September 1915. This was a mistake, as he came to be personally associated with the continuing losses at the front. He was also away at the remote HQ at Mogilev, far from the direct governance of the empire, and when revolution broke out in Petrograd he was unable to halt it. In reality the move was largely symbolic, since all important military decisions were made by his chief-of-staff General Michael Alexeiev, and Nicholas did little more than review troops, inspect field hospitals, and preside over military luncheons.
The Duma was still calling for political reforms and political unrest continued throughout the war. Cut off from public opinion, Nicholas could not see that the dynasty was in decline. With Nicholas at the front, domestic issues and control of the capital were left with his wife Alexandra. However, Alexandra’s relationship with Grigori Rasputin, and her German background, further discredited the dynasty’s authority. Nicholas had been repeatedly warned about the destructive influence of Grigori Rasputin but had failed to remove him. Rumors and accusations about Alexandra and Rasputin appeared one after another. Alexandra was even brought under allegations of treason and undermining the government due to her German roots. Anger at Nicholas’s failure to act and the extreme damage that Rasputin’s influence was doing to Russia’s war effort and to the monarchy led to Rasputin’s murder by a group of nobles, led by Prince Felix Yusupov and Grand Duke Dmitri Pavlovich, a cousin of the Tsar, on 16 December 1916 (or Saturday 30 December 1916 in the Gregorian calandar).
The collapse of his reign
As the government failed to produce supplies, mounting hardship created massive riots and rebellions. With Nicholas away at the front from 1915 through 1916, authority appeared to collapse, and the capital was left in the hands of strikers and mutineering conscript soldiers. Despite efforts by the British Ambassador Sir George Buchanan to warn the Tsar that he should grant constitutional reforms to fend off revolution, Nicholas continued to bury himself away at the Staff HQ (Stavka) 400 miles (600 km) away at Moghilev, leaving his capital and court open to intrigues and insurrection.
By early 1917, Russia was on the verge of total collapse. The army had taken 15 million men from the farms and food prices had soared. An egg cost four times what it had in 1914, butter five times as much. The severe winter dealt the railways, overburdened by emergency shipments of coal and supplies, the final blow.
Russia began the war with 20,000 locomotives; by 1917, 9,000 were in service, while the number of serviceable railway wagons had dwindled from half a million to 170,000. In February 1917, 1,200 locomotives burst their boilers and nearly 60,000 wagons were immobilised. In Petrograd supplies of flour and fuel all but disappeared. War-time prohibition of alcohol was enacted by Nicholas to boost patriotism and productivity, but instead damaged the treasury and funding of the war due to the treasury now being deprived of alcohol taxes.
On 23 February 1917 in Petrograd, a combination of very severe cold weather and acute food shortages caused people to start to break shop windows to get bread and other necessaries. In the streets, red banners appeared and the crowds chanted “Down with the German woman! Down with Protopopov! Down with the war! Down with the Tsar!”
Police started to shoot at the populace from rooftops which incited riots. The troops in the capital were poorly motivated and their officers had no reason to be loyal to the regime. They were angry and full of revolutionary fervor and sided with the populace.
The Tsar’s Cabinet begged Nicholas to return to the capital and offered to resign completely. Five hundred miles away the Tsar, misinformed by Protopopov that the situation was under control, ordered that firm steps be taken against the demonstrators. For this task the Petrograd garrison was quite unsuitable. The cream of the old regular army lay in their graves in Poland and Galicia. In Petrograd, 170,000 recruits, country boys or older men from the working-class suburbs of the capital itself, remained to keep control under the command of wounded officers invalided from the front, and cadets from the military academies. Many units, lacking both officers and rifles, had never undergone formal training.
General Khabalov attempted to put the Tsar’s instructions into effect on the morning of Sunday, 11 March 1917. Despite huge posters ordering people to keep off the streets, vast crowds gathered and were only dispersed after some 200 had been shot dead, though a company of the Volinsky Regiment fired into the air rather than into the mob, and a company of the Pavlovsky Life Guards shot the officer who gave the command to open fire. Nicholas, informed of the situation by Rodzianko, ordered reinforcements to the capital and suspended the Duma. It was too late.
On 12 March, the Volinsky Regiment mutinied and was quickly followed by the Semenovsky, the Ismailovsky, the Litovsky and even the legendary Preobrazhensky Regiment of Guard, the oldest and staunchest regiment founded by Peter the Great. The arsenal was pillaged, the Ministry of the Interior, Military Government building, police headquarters, the Law Courts and a score of police buildings were put to the torch. By noon the fortress of Peter and Paul, with its heavy artillery, was in the hands of the insurgents. By nightfall, 60,000 soldiers had joined the revolution.
Order broke down, and members of the Duma and the Soviet formed a Provisional Government to try to restore order. They issued a demand that Nicholas must abdicate. Faced with this demand, which was echoed by his generals, deprived of loyal troops, with his family firmly in the hands of the Provisional Government and fearful of unleashing civil war and opening the way for German conquest, Nicholas had little choice but to submit.
At the end of the “February Revolution” of 1917 (February in the Old Russian Calendar), on 2 March (Julian Calendar)/ 15 March (Gregorian Calendar) 1917, Nicholas II chose to abdicate. He first abdicated in favour of Tsarevich Alexei, but swiftly changed his mind after advice from doctors that the heir-apparent would not live long apart from his parents, who would be forced into exile. Nicholas drew up a new manifesto naming his brother, Grand Duke Michael, as the next Emperor of all the Russias. He issued the following statement (which was suppressed by the Provisional Government):
In the days of the great struggle against the foreign enemies, who for nearly three years have tried to enslave our fatherland, the Lord God has been pleased to send down on Russia a new heavy trial. Internal popular disturbances threaten to have a disastrous effect on the future conduct of this persistent war. The destiny of Russia, the honor of our heroic army, the welfare of the people and the whole future of our dear fatherland demand that the war should be brought to a victorious conclusion whatever the cost. The cruel enemy is making his last efforts, and already the hour approaches when our glorious army together with our gallant allies will crush him. In these decisive days in the life of Russia, We thought it Our duty of conscience to facilitate for Our people the closest union possible and a consolidation of all national forces for the speedy attainment of victory. In agreement with the Imperial Duma We have thought it well to renounce the Throne of the Russian Empire and to lay down the supreme power. As We do not wish to part from Our beloved son, We transmit the succession to Our brother, the Grand Duke Michael Alexandrovich, and give Him Our blessing to mount the Throne of the Russian Empire. We direct Our brother to conduct the affairs of state in full and inviolable union with the representatives of the people in the legislative bodies on those principles which will be established by them, and on which He will take an inviolable oath. In the name of Our dearly beloved homeland, We call on Our faithful sons of the fatherland to fulfill their sacred duty to the fatherland, to obey the Tsar in the heavy moment of national trials, and to help Him, together with the representatives of the people, to guide the Russian Empire on the road to victory, welfare, and glory. May the Lord God help Russia!
Grand Duke Michael declined to accept the throne until the people were allowed to vote through a Constituent Assembly for the continuance of the monarchy or a republic. The abdication of Nicholas II and the subsequent Bolshevik revolution brought three centuries of the Romanov dynasty’s rule to an end. The fall of autocratic Tsardom brought joy to Liberals and Socialists in Britain and France. The United States of America was the first foreign government to recognise the Provisional government, and entered the war early in April. In Russia, the announcement of the Tsar’s abdication was greeted with many emotions. These included delight, relief, fear, anger and confusion.
It is debatable whether Nicholas’ enforced abdication was actually legal, and whether he had the right to abdicate on behalf of his son. As Nicholas had already abdicated he was therefore merely a subject of his son, and only Prince Michael as Regent had the right to change the succession. Some historians contend that Nicholas remained the Tsar, at least in theory, until his death.
Final months and execution (1918)
Nicholas desperately wanted to go into exile in the United Kingdom following his abdication. The British government initially offered him asylum in England, but this was over-ruled by King George V who, acting on the advice of his secretary Lord Stamfordham, was worried that Nicholas’ presence in the UK might provoke an uprising like the previous year’s Easter Rising in Ireland.
In August 1917, the Kerensky government evacuated the Romanovs to Tobolsk in the Urals, allegedly to protect them from the rising tide of revolution. There they lived in the former Governor’s Mansion in considerable comfort. In October 1917, however, the Bolsheviks seized power from Kerensky’s Provisional Government; Nicholas followed the events in October with interest but not yet with alarm.
He continued to underestimate Lenin’s importance. In the meantime he and his family occupied themselves with keeping warm. Conditions of imprisonment became more strict, and talk of putting Nicholas on trial grew more frequent. The Tsar was forbidden to wear epaulettes.
On 1 March 1918, the family was placed on soldier’s rations, which meant parting with ten devoted servants and giving up butter and coffee as luxuries. What kept the family’s spirits up was the belief that help was at hand. The Romanovs believed that various plots were underway to break them out of captivity and smuggle them to safety. But on 30 April 1918 they were transferred to their final destination: the town of Yekaterinburg, where they were imprisoned in the two-story Ipatiev House, the home of the military engineer Nikolay Nikolayevich Ipatiev, which ominously became referred to as the “house of special purpose”.
In May 1918, central Russia was invaded by the Czech Legion (“White Czechs”). On 26 May they captured Chelyabinsk, executing all members of the local Soviet; on 31 May at Petropavlovsk they shot all 20 members of the local Soviet. The Komuch government formed on 8 June in Samara after the Czechs occupied the city. More than 5,000 people in the Volga region fell victim to this regime through the autumn of 1918.
There are several accounts on what happened and historians have not agreed on a solid, confirmed scope of events. By Yurovsky‘s (the chief executioner) account in the early hours of 17 July 1918, the royal family was awakened around 2:00 am, told to dress, and led down into a half-basement room at the back of the Ipatiev house. The pretext for this move was the family’s safety—that anti-Bolshevik forces were approaching Yekaterinburg, and the house might be fired upon.
Present with Nicholas, Alexandra and their children were their doctor and three of their servants, who had voluntarily chosen to remain with the family—the Tsar’s personal physician Eugene Botkin, his wife’s maid Anna Demidova, and the family’s chef, Ivan Kharitonov, and footman, Alexei Trupp. A firing squad had been assembled and was waiting in an adjoining room, composed of seven Communist soldiers from Central Europe, and three local Bolsheviks, all under the command of Bolshevik officer Yakov Yurovsky. The soldiers are often described as Hungarians; in his account, Yurovsky described them as “Latvians”.
Nicholas was carrying his son; when the family arrived in the basement, the former empress complained that there were no chairs for them to sit on. Yurovsky ordered two chairs brought in, and when the empress and the heir were seated, the executioners filed into the room. Yurovsky announced to them that they had been condemned to death by the Ural Soviet of Workers’ Deputies. A stunned Nicholas asked, “What? What?” and turned toward his family. Yurovsky quickly repeated the order and shot the former emperor outright.
The executioners drew revolvers and the shooting began. Nicholas was the first to die; Yurovsky shot him several times in the chest (sometimes incorrectly said the head, since his skull bore no bullet wounds when it was discovered in 1991). Anastasia, Tatiana, Olga, and Maria survived the first hail of bullets; the sisters were wearing over 1.3 kilograms of diamonds and precious gems sewn into their clothing, which provided some initial protection from the bullets and bayonets. They were stabbed with bayonets and then shot at close range in their heads.
An announcement from the Presidium of the Ural Regional Soviet of the Workers’ and Peasants’ Government emphasised that conspiracies had been exposed to free the ex-tsar, as well as how counter-revolutionary forces were pressing in on Soviet Russian territory, and that the ex-tsar was guilty of unforgivable crimes against the nation.
In view of the enemy’s proximity to Yekaterinburg and the exposure by the Cheka of a serious White Guard plot with the goal of abducting the former Tsar and his family… In light of the approach of counterrevolutionary bands toward the Red capital of the Urals and the possibility of the crowned executioner escaping trial by the people (a plot among the White Guards to try to abduct him and his family was exposed and the compromising documents will be published), the Presidium of the Ural Regional Soviet, fulfilling the will of the Revolution, resolved to shoot the former Tsar, Nikolai Romanov, who is guilty of countless, bloody, violent acts against the Russian people.
In 1979, the bodies of Tsar Nicholas II, Tsarina Alexandra, three of their daughters, and those of four non-family members killed with them, were discovered near Sverdlovsk by amateur archaeologist Alexander Avdonin. In January 1998, the remains excavated from underneath the dirt road near Yekaterinburg were officially identified as those of Nicholas II and his family (excluding one of his daughters and Alexei). The identifications, performed by separate Russian, British and American scientists using DNA analysis concur and were found to be conclusive. Nicholas belonged to the paternal haplogroup R1b; based upon Y-STR DNA test results on his remains, which have also been validated with results from a living relative. The Tsar belonged to the maternal haplogroup T based upon mitochondrial DNA mutations: 16126C, 16169Y, 16294T, 16296T, 73G, 263G, and 315.1C. The DNA analysis also revealed that the rate and pattern of sequence substitutions in the mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) control region (CR) is roughly twenty-fold higher than estimates derived from phylogenetic analyses. These results have implications for forensic applications and studies of human evolution. The tests also determined that Nicholas II’s mtDNA, as well as his brother‘s exhibited single base heteroplasmy. After the testing, the remains were finally interred at St. Peter and Paul Cathedral in Saint Petersburg on 17 July 1998, eighty years after the executions. The ceremony was attended by then Russian President Boris Yeltsin, who said, “Today is a historic day for Russia. For many years, we kept quiet about this monstrous crime, but the truth has to be spoken.”
In July 2007, 46-year-old builder Sergei Pogorelov (part of a team from an amateur history group who spent free summer weekends looking for the lost Romanovs) said that after stumbling on a small burned area of ground covered with nettles near Yekaterinburg he had discovered bones that belonged to “a boy and a young woman roughly the ages of Nicholas’ 13-year-old hemophiliac son, Alexei, and a daughter whose remains also have never been found.”
On 23 August 2007, acting on standard procedures, prosecutors reopened the investigation surrounding the deaths of the Imperial Family.
On 30 April 2008, DNA tests performed by a US laboratory proved that bone fragments exhumed in the Ural Mountains belonged to two children of Nicholas II, son Alexei (b. 1904) and daughter Maria (b. 1899), according to Russian news agencies. That same day it was announced by Russian authorities that the remains of the entire family had been identified.
On 1 October 2008, Russia’s Supreme Court ruled that Nicholas II and his family were victims of political repression and should be rehabilitated. In March 2009, results of the DNA testing were published, confirming that the two bodies discovered in 2007 were those of Alexei and his sister Maria.
|Tsar Nicholas II of Russia|
|Tsar-Martyr Nicholas II of Russia
Royal Passion-Bearer Tsar Nicholas II of Russia
18 May 1868|
Tsarskoye Selo,Saint Petersburg, Russia
|Died||17 July 1918
|Honored in||Russian Orthodox Church|
|Canonized||1981 and 2000, Russia by Russian Orthodox Church Abroad and the Russian Orthodox Church|
|Major shrine||Church on Blood, Ekaterinburg, Russia|
In 1981, Nicholas and his immediate family were recognised as martyred saints by the Russian Orthodox Church Outside Russia. On 14 August 2000, they were recognised by the synod of the Russian Orthodox Church. This time they were not named as martyrs, since their deaths did not result immediately from their Christian faith; instead, they were canonised as passion bearers. According to a statement by the Moscow synod, they were glorified as saints for the following reasons:
In the last Orthodox Russian monarch and members of his family we see people who sincerely strove to incarnate in their lives the commands of the Gospel. In the suffering borne by the Royal Family in prison with humility, patience, and meekness, and in their martyrs deaths in Yekaterinburg in the night of 17 July 1918 was revealed the light of the faith of Christ that conquers evil.
However, Nicholas’s canonisation was controversial. The Russian Orthodox Church Abroad was split on the issue back in 1981, some members suggesting that the emperor was a weak ruler and had failed to thwart the rise of the Bolsheviks. It was pointed out by one priest that martyrdom in the Russian Orthodox Church has nothing to do with the martyr’s personal actions but is instead related to why he or she was killed.
The Russian Orthodox Church inside Russia rejected the family’s classification as martyrs because they were not killed on account of their religious faith. Religious leaders in both churches also had objections to canonising the Tsar’s family because they perceived him as a weak emperor whose incompetence led to the revolution and the suffering of his people and made him partially responsible for his own murder and those of his wife, children and servants. For these opponents, the fact that the Tsar was, in private life, a kind man and a good husband and father or a leader who showed genuine concern for the peasantry did not override his poor governance of Russia.
Despite the original opposition, the Russian Orthodox Church inside Russia ultimately recognised the family as “passion bearers,” or people who met their deaths with Christian humility. The Church does not, however, recognise the remains interred at Peter and Paul Cathedral as being those of the Imperial Family.
[The Russian Empire] was ruled from the top by a sovereign who had but one idea of government—to preserve intact the absolute monarchy bequeathed to him by his father—and who, lacking the intellect, energy or training for his job, fell back on personal favorites, whim, simple mulishness, and other devices of the empty-headed autocrat. His father, Alexander III, who deliberately intended to keep his son uneducated in statecraft until the age of thirty, unfortunately miscalculated his own life expectancy, and died when Nicholas was twenty-six. The new Tsar had learned nothing in the interval, and the impression of imperturbability he conveyed was in reality apathy—the indifference of a mind so shallow as to be all surface. When a telegram was brought to him announcing the annihilation of the Russian fleet at Tsushima, he read it, stuffed it in his pocket, and went on playing tennis.
In Russia, Nicholas II faced widespread criticism after the victory of the Revolution. Pavel Bykov, who in Russia wrote the first full account about the downfall of the Tsar, denounced Nicholas as a “tyrant, who paid with his life for the age-old repression and arbitrary rule of his ancestors over the Russian people, over the impoverished and blood-soaked country”. Soviet-era historians noted that Nicholas II was not fit to be a statesman. It has been argued that he had a weak will and was manipulated by adventurist forces. His regime was condemned for extensive use of the army, police, and courts to destroy the revolutionary movement. He was criticised for fanning nationalism and chauvinism. With the punitive expeditions and courts-martial during the 1905 Revolution, the monarch became known as “Nicholas the Bloody”. Nicholas’ reign was seen as a time of suffering for Russians.
Robert K. Massie provides a more sympathetic view of the Tsar:
… there still are those who for political or other reasons continue to insist that Nicholas was “Bloody Nicholas”. Most commonly, he is described as shallow, weak, stupid—a one-dimensional figure presiding feebly over the last days of a corrupt and crumbling system. This, certainly, is the prevailing public image of the last Tsar. Historians admit that Nicholas was a “good man”—the historical evidence of personal charm, gentleness, love of family, deep religious faith and strong Russian patriotism is too overwhelming to be denied—but they argue that personal factors are irrelevant; what matters is that Nicholas was a bad tsar …. Essentially, the tragedy of Nicholas II was that he appeared in the wrong place in history.
Titles, styles, honours and Arms
Nicholas II of Russia
|Reference style||His Imperial Majesty|
|Spoken style||Your Imperial Majesty|
Titles and styles
- 18 May 1868 – 13 March 1881: His Imperial Highness Grand Duke Nikolay Alexandrovich of Russia
- 13 March 1881 – 1 November 1894: His Imperial Highness The Tsesarevich of Russia
- 1 November 1894 – 15 March 1917: His Imperial Majesty The Emperor and Autocrat of All the Russias
- 15 March 1917 – 17 July 1918: Mr. Nikolay Alexandroviсh Romanov
- Russia Order of St. Andrew (20 May 1868)
- Russia Order of St. Alexander Nevsky (20 May 1868)
- Russia Order of the White Eagle (20 May 1868)
- Russia Order of St. Anne, 1st class (20 May 1868)
- Russia Order of St. Stanislaus, 1st class (20 May 1868)
- Russia Order of St. Vladimir, 4th class (30 August 1890)
- Russia Order of Saint George, 4th class (25 October 1915)
- Grand Cross of the House Order of the Wendish Crown (Mecklenburg, 9 January 1879)
- Netherlands Knight Grand Cross of the Order of the Netherlands Lion (15 March 1881)
- Grand Cross of the House and Merit Order of Peter Frederick Louis (Oldenburg, 15 April 1881)
- Japan Order of the Rising Sun, Grand Cordon with Paulownia Flowers (Japan, 4 September 1882)
- Grand Cross of the House Order of Loyalty (Grand Duchy of Baden, 15 May 1883)
- Spain Order of the Golden Fleece (Spain, 15 May 1883)
- Portugal Knight Grand Cross of the Order of Christ (Portugal, 15 May 1883)
- Knights of the House Order of the White Falcon (Weimar, 15 May 1883)
- Sweden Knight of the Royal Order of the Seraphim (Sweden, 19 May 1883)
- Grand Cross of the Grand Ducal Ludwig Order (Hesse, 2 May 1884)
- Hungary Grand Cross of the Order of Saint Stephen of Hungary (6 May 1884)
- Bavaria Grand Cross of the Order of Saint Hubert (Bavaria, 6 May 1884)
- Belgium Grand Cordon of the Order of Leopold (Belgium, 6 May 1884)
- Bulgaria Grand Cross of the Order of St. Alexander (Bulgaria, 6 May 1884)
- Grand Cross of the Order of the Crown (Kingdom of Württemberg, 6 May 1884)
- Greece Grand Cross of the Order of the Redeemer (Greece, 6 May 1884)
- Denmark Knight of the Order of the Elephant (Denmark, 6 May 1884)
- Grand Cross of the Order of the Holy Sepulchre (Jerusalem Patriarchate) (6 May 1884)
- Kingdom of Italy Order of the Most Holy Annunciation (Italy, 6 May 1884)
- Kingdom of Italy Knight Grand Cross of the Order of Saints Maurice and Lazarus (Italy, 6 May 1884)
- Kingdom of Italy Knight Grand Cross of the Order of the Crown of Italy (6 May 1884)
- Prussia Order of the Black Eagle (Prussia 6 May 1884)
- Grand Cross with Collar of the Order of the Star of Romania (6 May 1884)
- France Grand Cross of the Legion of Honour (France, 6 May 1884)
- Grand Cross of the Order of Osmanieh (Ottoman Empire, 28 July 1884)
- Portrait of the Shah of Persia (28 July 1884)
- Empire of Brazil Knight Grand Cross of the Order of the Southern Cross (Brazil, 19 September 1884)
- Prussia Order of the Black Eagle (Prussia, 1884)
- Order of Noble Bukhara (2 November 1885) with diamonds (27 February 1889)
- Thailand Knight of the Order of the Royal House of Chakri (Thailand, 8 March 1891)
- Order of the Crown with brilliant characters (Bukhara, 21 November 1893)
- United Kingdom Knight of the Order of the Garter (United Kingdom, 1893)
- Denmark Order of the Dannebrog (Denmark, 1894)
- Order of the Seal of Solomon, 1st class (Ethiopia, 30 June 1895)
- Qing Dynasty Order of the Double Dragon, studded with diamonds (Chinese Empire, 22 April 1896)
- Order of the Sun of Alexander (Emirate of Bukhara, 18 May 1898)
- United Kingdom Grand Cross of the Order of the Bath (United Kingdom)
- United Kingdom Grand Cross of the Royal Victorian Order (United Kingdom, 1904)
- United Kingdom Royal Victorian Chain (United Kingdom, 1904)
- Order of Carol I (Romania, 15 June 1906)
- Sweden Chain of the Order of the Seraphim (Sweden, 12 May 1908)
- Order of the Precious rod (Mongolia, 1913)
- Gold Medal of Military Valour (Italy, 1916)
- Order of Saints Cyril and Methodius (Bulgaria)
- Grand Cross of the Order of Prince Danilo I (Montenegro)
The children of Nicholas II and Empress Alexandra are as follows:
|Grand Duchess Olga Nikolaevna||15 November [O.S. 3 November] 1895||17 July 1918||Shot at Yekaterinburg by the Bolsheviks|
|Grand Duchess Tatiana Nikolaevna||10 June [O.S. 29 May] 1897|
|Grand Duchess Maria Nikolaevna||26 June [O.S. 14 June] 1899|
|Grand Duchess Anastasia Nikolaevna||18 June [O.S. 5 June] 1901|
|Tsarevich Alexei Nikolaevich||12 August [O.S. 30 July] 1904|
Titles of the Imperial Crown of Russia
Nicholas II’s full title, as set forth in Article 59 of the 1906 Constitution read: “By the Grace of God, We Nicholas, Emperor and Autocrat of All the Russias, of Moscow, Kiev, Vladimir, Novgorod; Tsar of Kazan, Tsar of Astrakhan, Tsar of Poland, Tsar of Siberia, Tsar of Tauric Chersonesus, Lord of Pskov, and Grand Prince of Smolensk, Lithuania, Volhynia, Podolia, and Finland; Prince of Estonia, Livonia, Courland and Semigalia, Samogitia, Bielostok, Karelia, Tver, Yugor, Perm, Vyatka, Bogar and others; Sovereign and Grand Prince of Nizhni Novgorod, Chernigov, Ryazan, Polotsk, Rostov, Jaroslavl, Beloozero, Udoria, Obdoria, Kondia, Vitebsk, Mstislav, and Ruler of all Northern territories; Sovereign and Lord of Iveria, Kartalinia, the Kabardinian lands and Armenian province: hereditary Sovereign and Ruler of the Circassian and Mountain Princes and of others; Sovereign of Turkestan, Heir of Norway, Duke of Schleswig-Holstein, Stormarn, Dithmarschen, and Oldenburg, and so forth, and so forth, and so forth.”
Documentaries and films
Several films about Nicholas II and his family have been made, including Anastasia (1956), Nicholas and Alexandra (1971), Anastasia: The Mystery of Anna (1986), Rasputin: Dark Servant of Destiny (1996 HBO), Anastasia (1997).’ and two Russian adaptations Killer of the Czar (1991) and The Romanovs: An Imperial Family (2000).
- Warth, p. 26
- In 1831, the Russian tsars were deposed from the Polish throne, but they soon took control of the country, ruling it as part of Russia, and abolished the separate monarchy. However, they continued to use this title. See November Uprising.
- Nicholas’s full title was We, Nicholas, by the grace of God, Emperor and Autocrat of all the Russias, of Moscow, Kiev, Vladimir, Novgorod; Tsar of Kazan, Tsar of Astrakhan, Tsar of Poland, Tsar of Siberia, Tsar of Tauric Chersonesos, Tsar of Georgia; Lord of Pskov, and Grand Prince of Smolensk, Lithuania, Volhynia, Podolia, and Finland, Prince of Estonia, Livonia, Courland and Semigalia, Samogitia, Belostok, Karelia, Tver, Yugra, Perm, Vyatka, Bogaria, and other territories; Lord and Grand Prince of Nizhny Novgorod, Chernigov; Sovereign of Ryazan, Polotsk, Rostov, Yaroslavl, Beloozero, Udoria, Obdoria, Kondia, Vitebsk, Mstislav, and all the northern territories; and Sovereign of Iveria, Kartalinia, and the Kabardinian lands and Armenian territories; Hereditary Lord and Ruler of the Cherkass and Mountain Princes and others; Lord of Turkestan, Heir of Norway, Duke of Schleswig-Holstein, Stormarn, Dithmarschen, Oldenburg, and so forth, and so forth, and so forth.
- 2 March 1917 in the Julian Calendar then in use in Russia, which is the same day as 15 March 1917 in the Gregorian Calendar used elsewhere at that time.
- Woods, Alan (1999) “The First Russian Revolution” in Bolshevism: The Road to Revolution by Alan Woods, Well Red Publications, ISBN 1900007053
- Kallistov, D. P. (1977). History of the USSR in Three Parts: From the earliest times to the Great October Socialist Revolution. Progress Publishers.
- Urlanis, Boris (2003). Wars and Population. University Press of the Pacific. ISBN 1410209458
- Banks, ECS (2012) Road to Ekaterinburg: Nicholas and Alexandra’s Daughters 1913–1918. SilverWood Books. ISBN 978-1-78132-035-8
- New York Times (2000) Nicholas II And Family Canonized For Passion
- A Reader’s Guide to Orthodox Icons The Icons that Canonized the Holy Royal Martyrs
- Fleming, Olivia (15 October 2012). “Meet the 14th Century African king who was richest man in the world of all time (adjusted for inflation!)”. London: Daily Mail.
- “The world’s most wealthiest people of all time”. Yahoo! Finance. 16 October 2012. Archived from the original on 22 May 2013. Retrieved 22 May 2013.
- The letters of Tsar Nicholas and Empress Marie: being confidential correspondence between Nicholas II, last of the Tsars, and his mother, Dowager Empress Maria Feodorovna. Edward J. Bing (ed.). London: Nicholson and Watson, 1937.
- Van Der Kiste, John (2003) The Romanovs: 1818–1959, Sutton Publishing, p. 151
- Clay, Catarine (2006) King, Kaiser, Tsar: Three Royal Cousins Who Led the World to War, Walker & Company, ISBN 0802716237, p. 54
- Magnus, Philip (1964) King Edward the Seventh , E.P. Dutton & Co, p. 126
- 1 March 1881 in the Julian Calendar then in use in Russia, which is the same day as 13 March 1881 in the Gregorian Calendar used elsewhere at that time.
- Massie (1967) p. 38
- King (1994) p. 54
- Massie (1967) p. 40
- Pierre, Andre (1925) Journal Intime de Nicholas II, Paris: Payot, p. 45
- King (1994) p. 70
- King (2006) p. 326
- Figes, Orlando (1996), A People’s Tragedy, p. 18.
- Feinstein, Elaine (2006). Excerpt from Anna of All the Russias. Vintage. ISBN 978-1-4000-3378-2.
- Massie (1967) p. 42.
- Massie (1967) p. 44
- Warth, p. 20
- Pierre, Andre (1925) Journal Intime de Nicholas II, Paris: Payot, p. 127
- Radziwill, Catherine (1931) Nicholas II, The Last of the Tsars, London: Cassell And Company Ltd., p. 100.
- Massie (1967) p. 1017
- Warth, pp. 26–27
- King (2006) p. 420
- King, Greg (2007) Twilight of Splendor: the Court of Queen Victoria in Her Diamond Jubilee Year , John Wiley & Sons, pp. 173–175
- The Nomination Database for the Nobel Prize in Peace, 1901–1956. Nobelprize.org. Retrieved on 1 May 2014.
- King (2006) p. 137
- Kowner, Historical Dictionary of the Russo-Japanese War, p. 260-264.
- Warth, p. 67
- “Beyond the Pale: The Pogroms of 1903–1906”. Retrieved 17 July 2008.
- Massie (1967) pp. 94–95, 122 in Russian edition
- Solzhenitsyn, Alexander (2001) Two hundred years together. Moscow. p. 329
- Figes, Orlando (1996), A People’s Tragedy, pp. 197–8
- Massie (1967) p. 124
- Massie (1967) pp. 124–125
- Cf.: Massie (1967) p. 125. — Massie’s translation is not authentic.
- “State Archive of the Russian Federation, ф.601.ОП.1, д.248. Diary of Nickolas Romanov. 9 January 1905. (”in Russian”)”. Militera.lib.ru. Retrieved 25 October 2010.
- Vorres, Ian (1985) The Last Grand Duchess, London, Finedawn Publishers, p. 121
- Kenez, Peter (1999) A History of the Soviet Union From the Beginning to the End, Cambridge University Press, ISBN 0521311985, p. 7. This was hugely significant in regards to the illiterate peasantry or ‘dark masses’ who although they followed their own (almost pagan rituals) had until this point held complete naive faith in Tsar Nicholas II.
- Lyons, M (1974) Nicholas II, The Last Tsar, Routledge & Kegan Paul, ISBN 0710078021, p. 116
- Massie (1967) p. 243
- Massie (1967) p. 242
- Massie (1967) p. 244
- Massie (1967) p. 245
- Massie (1967) p. 246
- Massie (1967) p. 247.
- Massie (1967) p. 248
- Massie (1967) p. 226
- Tames, p. 49.
- Massie (1967) p. 185
- Clay, Catarine (2006) King, Kaiser, Tsar: Three Royal Cousins Who Led the World to War, Walker & Company, ISBN 0802716237, pp. 300–301
- King (2006) p. 391
- King (2006) p. 397
- Merriman, John (2009) A History of Modern Europe Volume Two, W. W. Norton & Company, ISBN 0393933857, p. 967
- The Evidence in the Case. A Discussion of the Moral Responsibility for the War of 1914, as Disclosed by the Diplomatic Records of England, Germany, Russia, France, Austria, Italy and Belgium. By James M. Beck (James M. Beck – LL.D. Late Assistant Attorney-General of the U. S. Author of “The War and Humanity.”), (p.81, p. 106)
- Palaeologus, M. G. (1991) Tsarist Russia during World War, Moscow: International Relations, pp. 155, 156 (in Russian); 1st Edition: Paléologue M.G. La Russie des Tsars pendant la grande guerre.— Paris: Plon, 1922. (Chapter XII); Maurice Paléologue. An ambassador’s memoirs (Volume 1, Chapter VIII, see Sunday, 31 January 1915)
- Buchanan, G. (1923) My Mission to Russia and other diplomatic memories. London: Cassell. p. 200. Archive.org. Retrieved on 1 May 2014.
- Churchill, Winston (1931) The unknown war. London: C. Scribner’s Sons, p. 170.
- Massie (1967) pp. 84, 320 in Russian edition
- Martin Gilbert. The First World War: A Complete History, 1994, p. 27
- John Keegan. The First World War, 1998, p. 63
- Hew Strachan, The First World War, Vol I: To Arms (2001), p. 85
- Hamilton, Richard F. and Herwig, Holger H. (2003) Origins of World War One, Cambridge University Press, ISBN 0521817358, p. 514
- Zubov, Andrei (ed.) (2010) History of Russia XX Century Volume I, 1894–1939, AST Publishers, p. 291
- Tames, p. 43
- Josef und Ulli. “Germany during World War One”. Archived from the original on 18 October 2009. Retrieved 7 September 2009.
- Tames, p. 42
- Tames, p. 46
- Hall, C (2006) Little Mother of Russia, Holmes and Meier, ISBN 0841914222, p. 264
- King, Greg and Wilson, Penny (2003) The Fate of the Romanovs, John Wiley & Sons, ISBN 0471207683
- Tames, p. 52
- Warth, p. 199
- Tames, p. 53
- Tames, p. 55
- Tames, p. 62.
- “Библиотека Гумер – учебник История России – Ратьковский И.С., Ходяков М.В. История Советской России”. Gumer.info. Retrieved 24 October 2012.
- Nicholas & Alexandra – The Last imperial Family of Tsarist Russia, Booth-Clibborn Editions, 1998, ISBN 1861540388
- Massie (1995) p. 8.
- Massie (1995) p. 6.
- Alexander, Robert (2003). The Kitchen Boy: A Novel of the Last Tsar. Penguin Group US. ISBN 978-1-101-20036-0.
- Telegraph quoted in The Kitchen Boy by Robert Alexander (unpaginated).
- (Russian) “Экспертиза подтвердила, что найденные останки принадлежат Николаю II”. ITAR-TASS. 5 December 2008. Archived from the original on 7 August 2011.
- Coble, M. D.; Loreille, O. M.; Wadhams, M. J.; Edson, S. M.; Maynard, K.; Meyer, C. E.; Niederstätter, H.; Berger, C.; Berger, B.; Falsetti, A. B.; Gill, P.; Parson, W.; Finelli, L. N. (2009). “Mystery Solved: The Identification of the Two Missing Romanov Children Using DNA Analysis”. PLoS ONE 4 (3): e4838. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0004838. PMID 19277206.
- “Famous DNA”. Isogg.org. Retrieved 25 October 2010.
- Parsons TJ, Muniec DS, Sullivan K, Woodyatt N, Alliston-Greiner R, Wilson MR, Berry DL, Holland KA, Weedn VW, Gill P, Holland MM (1997). “A high observed substitution rate in the human mitochondrial DNA control region”. Nature genetics 15 (4): 363–8. doi:10.1038/ng0497-363. PMID 9090380.
- “Romanovs laid to rest”. BBC News. 17 July 1998.
- Harding, Luke (25 August 2007). “Bones found by Russian builder finally solve riddle of the missing Romanovs”. The Guardian (London). Retrieved 20 May 2010.
- “DNA Confirms Remains of Tsar’s Children”. CBS News. Associated Press. 30 April 2008. Retrieved 28 September 2007.
- Details on further testing of the Imperial remains are contained in Rogaev, E.I., Grigorenko, A.P., Moliaka, I.K., Faskhutdinova, G., Goltsov,A., Lahti, A., Hildebrandt, C., Kittler, E.L.W. and Morozova, I., “Genomic identification in historical case of Nicholas II Royal family.”, Proceedings of the National Academy of Science, (2009). The mitochondrial DNA of Alexandra, Alexei, and Maria are identical and of haplogroup H1. The mitochondrial DNA of Nicholas was haplogroup T2. Their sequences are published at GenBank as FJ656214, FJ656215, FJ656216, and FJ656217.
- BBC News. Russia’s last Tsar rehabilitated. Retrieved on 1 October 2008
- “Last Tsar’s family rehabilitated”. Russiatoday.com. 1 October 2008. Retrieved 7 September 2009.
- “Russia’s Last Tsar Declared Victim of Repression”. TIME. Retrieved 7 September 2009.[dead link]
- “DNA proves Bolsheviks killed all of Russian Tsar’s children”, CNN, 22 December 2008.
- Massie (1995) pp. 134–135.
- Ferro, Marc (1995) Nicholas II: Last of the Tsars. New York: Oxford University Press, ISBN 0-19-508192-7, p. 2
- Tuchman, Barbara W. The Guns of August. New York: Presidio Press, 1962, p.71.
- Massie (1967) pp. viii–x.
- King, Greg (1994). The Last Empress. Birch Lane Press.
- King, Greg (2006). The Court of the Last Czar: Pomp, Power and Pageantry in the Reign of Nicholas II. John Wiley & Sons.
- Kowner, Rotem (2006). Historical Dictionary of the Russo-Japanese War. ISBN 0-8108-4927-5: The Scarecrow Press.
- Massie, Robert K. (1967). Nicholas and Alexandra.
- Massie, Robert K. (1995). The Fate of the Romanovs: The Final Chapter. Random House. ISBN 0-394-58048-6.
- Tames, Richard (1972). Last of the Tsars. London: Pan Books Ltd.
- Warth, Robert D. (1997). Nicholas II, The Life and Reign of Russia’s Last Monarch. Praeger. ISBN 0275958329.
- The Sokolov Report, in Victor Alexandrov, “The End of The Romanovs”, London: 1966
- Boris Antonov, Russian Czars, St. Petersburg, Ivan Fiodorov Art Publishers (ISBN 5-93893-109-6)
- Michael M. Baden, Chapter III: Time of Death and Changes after Death. Part 4: Exhumation, In: Spitz, W.U. & Spitz, D.J. (eds): Spitz and Fisher’s Medicolegal Investigation of Death. Guideline for the Application of Pathology to Crime Investigations (Fourth edition). Charles C. Thomas, pp.: 174–183, Springfield, Illinois: 2006
- Paul Grabbe, “The Private World of the Last Czar” New York: 1985
- Genrikh Ioffe, Revoliutsiia i sud’ba Romanovykh Moscow: Respublika, 1992 (Russian)
- Coryne Hall & John Van der Kiste, Once A Grand Duchess : Xenia, Sister of Nicholas II, Phoenix Mill, Sutton Publishing Ltd., 2002 (hardcover, ISBN 0-7509-2749-6)
- Dominic Lieven, Nicholas II: Emperor of All the Russias. 1993.
- Andrei Maylunas and Sergei Mironenko, A Lifelong Passion: Nicholas & Alexandra 1999
- Marvin Lyons, Nicholas II The Last Czar, London, Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1974 (hardcover, ISBN 0-7100-7802-1)
- Shay McNeal, “The Secret Plot to Save the Czar” 2001
- Bernard Pares, “The Fall of the Russian Monarchy” London: 1939, reprint London: 1988
- John Curtis Perry and Konstantin Pleshakov, The Flight of the Romanovs. 1999.
- Edvard Radzinsky, The Last Tsar: The Life and Death of Nicholas II (1992) ISBN 0-385-42371-3.
- Samten, Jampa. (2010). “Notes on the Thirteenth Dalai Lama‘s Confidential Letter to the Tsar of Russia.” In: The Tibet Journal, Special issue. Autumn 2009 vol XXXIV n. 3-Summer 2010 vol XXXV n. 2. “The Earth Ox Papers”, edited by Roberto Vitali, pp. 357–370.
- Mark D. Steinberg and Vladimir M. Khrustalev, The Fall of the Romanovs: Political Dreams and Personal Struggles in a Time of Revolution, New Haven: Yale University Press, 1995.
- Anthony Summers and Tom Mangold, The File on the Czar. 1976.
- Andrew M. Verner, The Crisis of the Russian Autocracy: Nicholas II and the 1905 Revolution 1990
- Richard Wortman, Scenarios of Power: Myth and Ceremony in Russian Monarchy, vol. 2 2000
- Prince Felix Yussupov, Lost Splendour
- Elisabeth Heresch, “Nikolaus II. Feigheit, Lüge und Verrat”. F.A.Herbig Verlagsbuchhandlung, München, 1992
- The Complete Wartime Correspondence of Czar Nicholas II and the Empress Alexandra, April 1914 – March 1917. Edited by Joseph T. Furhmann Fuhrmann. Westport, Conn. and London: 1999
- Letters of Czar Nicholas and Empress Marie Ed. Edward J. Bing. London: 1937
- Letters of the Czar to the Czaritsa, 1914–1917 Trans. from Russian translations from the original English. E. L. Hynes. London and New York: 1929
- Nicky-Sunny Letters: correspondence of the Czar and Czaritsa, 1914–1917. Hattiesburg, Miss: 1970.
- The Secret Letters of the Last Czar: Being the Confidential Correspondence between Nicholas II and his Mother, Dowager Empress Maria Feodorovna. Ed. Edward J. Bing. New York and Toronto: 1938
- Willy-Nicky Correspondence: Being the Secret and Intimate Telegrams Exchanged Between the Kaiser and the Czar. Ed. Herman Bernstein. New York: 1917.
- Paul Benckendorff, Last Days at Czarskoe Selo. London: 1927
- Sophie Buxhoeveden, The Life and Tragedy of Alexandra Fedorovna, Empress of Russia: A Biography London: 1928
- Pierre Gilliard, Thirteen Years at the Russian Court New York: 1921
- A. A. Mossolov (Mosolov), At the Court of the Last Czar London: 1935
- Anna Vyrubova, Memories of the Russian Court London: 1923
- A.Yarmolinsky, editor, “The Memoirs of Count Witte” New York & Toronto: 1921
- Sir George Buchanan (British Ambassador) My Mission to Russia & Other Diplomatic Memories (2 vols, Cassell, 1923)
- Meriel Buchanan, Dissolution of an Empire, Cassell, 1932
- Gleb Botkin, The Real Romanovs, Fleming H. Revell Co, 1931
- Mark D. Steinberg and Vladimir M. Khrustalev, The Fall of the Romanovs: Political Dreams and Personal Struggles in a Time of Revolution. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1995
- Page, Walter Hines; Page, Arthur Wilson (October 1904). “The Personality of the Czar: An Explanation, By A Russian Official Of High Authority”. The World’s Work: A History of Our Time VIII: 5414–5430.
|Wikimedia Commons has media related to Nicholas II of Russia.|
|Wikisource has the text of the 1922 Encyclopædia Britannica article Nicholas II..|
- Nicholas_II at DMOZ
- Nicholas II of Russia at the Notable Names Database
- The Execution of Czar Nicholas II, 1918, EyeWitness to History.
- Brief Summary of Czar
- Abdication Proclamation, 2 March 1917 (the signature was put in pencil) (translation included)
- Alexander Palace Time Machine
- Nicholas and Alexandra Exhibition
- Frozentears.org A Media Library to Nicholas II and his Family.
- Romanov sisters
- Scientists Reopen Czar Mystery
- Ipatiev House — Romanov Memorial detailed site on the historical context, circumstances and drama surrounding the Romanov’s execution
- (Russian) The Murder of Russia’s Imperial Family, Nicolay Sokolov. Investigation of execution of the Romanov Imperial Family in 1918.
- (Russian) Nikolay II — Life and Death, Edvard Radzinski. Later published in English as The Last Czar: the Life and Death of Nicholas II.
- New Russian Martyrs. Czar Nicholas and His Family. A story of life, canonisation. Photoalbum.
- Russian History Magazine Articles about the Romanovs from Atlantis magazine.
- Resurrecting the Czar – November 2010 (Smithsonian magazine)
- Romanovs. The eighth film. Alexander III; Nicholas II on YouTube. – Historical reconstruction “The Romanovs”. StarMedia. Babich-Design(Russia, 2013)
Nicholas II of Russia
Cadet branch of the House of Oldenburg
Born: 18 May 1868 Died: 17 July 1918
|Emperor and Autocrat of All the Russias
|Grand Duke of Finland
Title next held by
|Titles in pretence|
|Loss of title
|— TITULAR —
Emperor of Russia
Reason for succession failure:
Empire abolished in 1917
This article uses material from the Wikipedia article Nicholas II of Russia, which is released under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share-Alike License 3.0.