Wikipedia:Przejmowanie nazwy użytkownika/Uroboross - Uroboros
Z Wikipedii
[edytuj] Uroboross → Uroboros
- Obecna nazwa: Uroboross (dyskusja • edycje)
- Dla biurokratów: Mail do użytkownika
Hello. I am bg:User:Uroboros (verify), an active editor on BG WP and several other projects. For the sake of successful SUL, I would like to have the local User:Uroboros usurped in my favour. Thank you in advance, Uroboross (dyskusja) 19:17, 30 maj 2008 (CEST)
- Sorry, accounts with edits cannot be usurped. LeinaD dyskusja 20:14, 30 maj 2008 (CEST)
- 2 edits older then 2 yars and 23 days?? Do you really find them GFDL-important?? Look, I am an editor in Wikipedia since 22:15, 9 November 2005. I have 5 000 serious edits and 7 Featured articles! You perfectly well know that technically I can have my SUL with or without the polish wikipedia. You perfectly well know that unified login is not only for the sake of single sign-up but also for consistent identity across all wikis. With your decision you not only deprive me from my consistent identity, but also prevent your colleague locally. Because you perfectly well know that if some day this local user gets active again and wants to have this account global, he wont be able because I will be owning it. And you perfectly well know that if he needs a rename in order to keep his 2 contributions (because of which you reject my request!) he will need to first have this global account deleted. Then he will be in position to request it from me, but I am not sure that I bother to help him. So, please try to reconsider your decision, it will be much wiser of yours to enable both of use have our different consistent identities.--Uroboross (dyskusja) 21:36, 30 maj 2008 (CEST)
- Personally I think that account should be usurped, but I have to keep the rules. I will try bring Polish Wikipedia community round to change rules. LeinaD dyskusja 14:47, 31 maj 2008 (CEST)
- Well, thank you. I do hope that your community will revise the policy, which seems to me the most bureaucratic (in the bad sense of this word) of all which I had to comply with. Do not forget that you're dealing with humans, not just edits in the page histories. :) Regards, Uroboross (dyskusja) 15:25, 31 maj 2008 (CEST)
- Personally I think that account should be usurped, but I have to keep the rules. I will try bring Polish Wikipedia community round to change rules. LeinaD dyskusja 14:47, 31 maj 2008 (CEST)
- 2 edits older then 2 yars and 23 days?? Do you really find them GFDL-important?? Look, I am an editor in Wikipedia since 22:15, 9 November 2005. I have 5 000 serious edits and 7 Featured articles! You perfectly well know that technically I can have my SUL with or without the polish wikipedia. You perfectly well know that unified login is not only for the sake of single sign-up but also for consistent identity across all wikis. With your decision you not only deprive me from my consistent identity, but also prevent your colleague locally. Because you perfectly well know that if some day this local user gets active again and wants to have this account global, he wont be able because I will be owning it. And you perfectly well know that if he needs a rename in order to keep his 2 contributions (because of which you reject my request!) he will need to first have this global account deleted. Then he will be in position to request it from me, but I am not sure that I bother to help him. So, please try to reconsider your decision, it will be much wiser of yours to enable both of use have our different consistent identities.--Uroboross (dyskusja) 21:36, 30 maj 2008 (CEST)
