Price negotiation and pricing of anticancer drugs in China: An observational study
by Jing Zhou, Tianjiao Lan, Hao Lu, Jay Pan
Background
While China has implemented reimbursement-linked drug price negotiation annually since 2017, emphasizing value-based pricing to achieve a value-based strategic purchase of medical insurance, whether drug prices became better aligned with clinical value after price negotiation has not been sufficiently established. This study aimed to assess the changes in prices and their relationship with the clinical value of anticancer drugs after the implementation of price negotiations in China.
Methods and findings
In this observational study, anticancer drug indications that were negotiated successfully between 2017 and 2022 were identified through National Reimbursement Drug Lists (NRDL) of China. We excluded extensions of indications for drugs already listed in the NRDL, indications for pediatric use, and indications lacking corresponding clinical trials. We identified pivotal clinical trials for included indications by consulting review reports or drug labels issued by the Center for Drug Evaluation, National Medical Products Administration. We calculated treatment costs as outcome measures based on publicly available prices and collected data on clinical value including safety, survival, quality of life, and overall response rate (ORR) from publications of pivotal clinical trials. The associations between drug costs and clinical value, both before and after negotiation, were analyzed using regression analyses. We also examined whether price negotiation has led to a reduction in the variation of treatment costs for a given value.We included 103 anticancer drug indications, primarily for the treatment of blood cancer, lung cancer, and breast cancer, with 76 supported by randomized controlled trials and 27 supported by single-arm clinical trials. The median treatment costs over the entire sample have been reduced from US$34,460.72 (interquartile range (IQR): 19,990.49 to 55,441.66) to US$13,688.79 (IQR: 7,746.97 to 21,750.97) after price negotiation (P P P = 0.009) increase in treatment costs for indications supported by single-arm clinical trials. After price negotiation, the associations between costs and clinical value may not have changed significantly, but the variation of drug costs for a given value was reduced. Study limitations include the lack of transparency in official data, missing data on clinical value, and a limited sample size.
Conclusions
In this study, we found that the implementation of price negotiation in China has led to drug pricing better aligned with clinical value for anticancer drugs even after substantial price reductions. The achievements made in China could shed light on the price regulation inother countries, particularly those with limited resources and increasing drug expenditures.
Our "Network":Project Gutenberg
https://gutenberg.classicistranieri.com
EncyclopaediaBritannica1911
https://encyclopaediabritannica.classicistranieri.com
Librivox Audiobooks
https://librivox.classicistranieri.com
Linux Distributions
https://old.classicistranieri.com
Magnatune (MP3 Music)
https://magnatune.classicistranieri.com
Static Wikipedia (June 2008)
https://wikipedia.classicistranieri.com
Static Wikipedia (March 2008)
https://wikipedia2007.classicistranieri.com/mar2008/
Static Wikipedia (2007)
https://wikipedia2007.classicistranieri.com
Static Wikipedia (2006)
https://wikipedia2006.classicistranieri.com
Liber Liber
https://liberliber.classicistranieri.com
ZIM Files for Kiwix
https://zim.classicistranieri.com
Other Websites:
Bach - Goldberg Variations
https://www.goldbergvariations.org
Lazarillo de Tormes
https://www.lazarillodetormes.org
Madame Bovary
https://www.madamebovary.org
Il FuMattiaPascal
https://www.mattiapascal.it
The Voice in the Desert
https://www.thevoiceinthedesert.org
Confessione d'un amorefascista
https://www.amorefascista.it
Malinverno
https://www.malinverno.org
Debito formativo
https://www.debitoformativo.it
Adina Spire
https://www.adinaspire.com